Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Mears's avatar

Because I'm employed by a workplace and don't want to pay my own money, and my workplace is on Microsoft, I'm trying out using Claude Opus 4.5 as an agent via the GitHub Copilot feature (also accessible with GitHub CLI). I'll (maybe) let you know how it goes! I'm hoping it will give me more parallelisability of agents than an IDE-based agent. I'm already benefitting from your 'worktree' tip since I hadn't actually come across that git feature till now - much better for context-switching mid-flow.

So far my impression is that this way of using Claude might require less handholding than you allude to -- I don't have to tell it to 'do it yourself'. I guess the scaffolding is pretty decent. But nor have I yet tested it with a really meaty feature.

I wonder if my main blocker to using AI agents going forward might be getting co-workers on board: there are some norms to establish like how to trust that the human co-author has actually thoroughly reviewed what the agent has written (and is not just fobbing off that detail-oriented work to the second human reviewer). Also, I don't like when my coworkers use AI-generated commit messages (generated by an AI other than the actual agent who wrote the code, i.e. the dumb bot that lives in the GitLens VSCode extension) - needless to say, those are not very correlated with the actual reasons for the changes.

I will be referring to your blog post and Boris from Claude Code's twitter thread: https://x.com/bcherny/status/2007179832300581177?s=20

No posts

Ready for more?